Company / editorial standards

Useful work should show its assumptions.

Our service pages, guides and calculators explain what a buyer can decide, what we can build, and which details need verification. This page describes the editorial standard behind them.

Abstract SoulGait artwork representing careful digital work
Ownership

Who stands behind this content?

SoulGait publishes the material on this site as a specialist design, technology and growth business within APratap Group. The content represents SoulGait’s service approach and planning frameworks. It is not a practitioner endorsement, a clinical opinion, legal advice or a claim that we have served every tradition named on the site.

For commercial questions or a correction, contact sales@soulgait.com. For site or accessibility issues, contact support@soulgait.com. The contact page and privacy page explain how to reach us and how enquiries are handled.

How information is prepared

Clear sources, methods and limitations.

Service pages

We explain the service offered, the customer journey and the details a buyer needs to check before enquiring.

Guides

We prefer primary sources for technical or search platform claims, link them in context, explain assumptions and distinguish a planning example from observed client results.

Calculators

We expose inputs, formulas, worked examples and exclusions so a visitor can challenge an estimate. Output is scenario planning, not a revenue or performance guarantee.

Evidence and representation

Claims should reflect work we can substantiate.

Concept screens and project archetypes are labelled as illustrative. We will publish a client case study only with permission and a clear account of the problem, scope, measurement period and limitations. We do not use invented testimonials, logos, rankings, awards or numerical results.

Tradition-specific terminology and claims should be reviewed with the practitioner who delivers the service. For health-related practices, we distinguish service information from clinical claims and seek qualified market-specific review where needed. Naming a tradition does not establish subject-matter expertise.

External source links support factual claims but may change. We revise guidance when a platform, method or regulation changes and remove material that cannot be maintained. We do not add a fresh date merely to make old advice appear new.

Corrections and review

Make a correction traceable.

Send the page URL, the sentence or calculation you question and any supporting source to support@soulgait.com. We review the claim, reproduce calculator issues, and correct or qualify the public page when warranted. Material changes to a guide should include a genuine review rather than a cosmetic timestamp.

We review a page when the offer changes, a cited source is updated, a tool’s method changes or a reader identifies an error. A visible correction matters more than an updated date alone.

Limits

Use the pages for the decision they support.

The resources describe possible configurations and reasonable tests; they are not an implementation proposal or a promise of search traffic. Actual scope depends on your offer, technology, jurisdiction and the materials you can verify. See our illustrative work and evidence standard, methodology and site disclaimer.

Bring us a specific brief ↗